Amanda knox still dating Online xxx video chating
She told the court during the trial that the confession was made under duress but then repeated the entire account in a five page memorandum the next morning.The prosecution said the fact that Knox falsely accused Lumumba of being the killer was a sign of her own guilt and an attempt to throw them off her trail.There is, however, copious evidence to consider: the DNA alone is enough to raise questions.Leaving aside much of it, let’s focus for a moment on three key pieces of DNA evidence and present them from both sides, just as the jury may have heard them spoken of in court. The part of the victim’s bra containing the hooks had been ripped or slashed from the rest of her bra.Lumumba says Knox nearly ruined his life and is suing her for defamation. Sollecito could not back up Knox’s alibi on the night of the murder.She claimed she spent the evening with him, smoking marijuana, watching the French film Amelie and making love.
Police geneticist, Patrizia Stefanoni, swabbed spots on the blade of the knife and on the handle in the knife’s first DNA Test.And whilst both parties protest their innocence , Thursday’s decision shows that there is real evidence against her and Sollecito, that cannot be ignored.Knox confessed that she was in the house on the night of the murder and that she heard Miss Kercher scream, identifying a Congolese bar owner, Patrick Lumumba, as the assailant.Not immediately collected on that first day after the murder, it remained in the room in a sealed house for six weeks before being sent to the lab in December.There, it was tested and found to contain a large sample of Meredith’s DNA, together with a smaller but clearly visible contribution from Sollecito.